Η ΔΙΕΘΝΟΠΟΙΗΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΚΑΤΑΓΓΕΛΙΑΣ ΤΩΝ ΑΠΕΡΓΩΝ ΠΕΙΝΑΣ ΥΓΕΙΟΝΟΜΙΚΩΝ ΥΠΑΛΛΗΛΩΝ !!

 

Έχει ήδη αποσταλεί σε δεκάδες διευθύνσεις. Στον Ο.Η.Ε., την Ευρωβουλή και

συγκεκριμένους ευρωβουλευτές, στα μεγαλύτερα Μ.Μ.Ε. της Ευρώπης, των Η.Π.Α. και της Ασίας, στα αντίστοιχα Ε.Σ.Ρ. του εξωτερικού, σε πρεσβείες. Και είναι μόνο το πρώτο μέρος. Αύριο, η μεταφρασμένη στην αγγλική γλώσσα καταγγελία των πέντε υγειονομικών απεργών πείνας, με το δικό μου εισαγωγικό κείμενο και το εισαγωγικό της μήνυσης της 19ης Ιουλίου 2021, θα σταλεί σε άλλες τόσες διευθύνσεις.

Σήμερα επιδόθηκε στον εισαγγελέα του Αρείου Πάγου η αναφορά-δυναμίτης που διάβασα στο χθεσινό live στο facebook (ανεβαίνει το βίντεο εδώ και στο κανάλι σε λίγα λεπτά), καθώς και η εξώδικη πρόσκληση σε Μητσοτάκη-Πλεύρη, που επίσης διάβασα στο live. Αύριο θα δημοσιεύσω τα δύο κείμενα με τα αποδεικτικά επιδόσεως. Την Παρασκευή κλιμακώνω τις επιθέσεις στη Δικαιοσύνη και την ομάδα που ακόμα την ελέγχει.

Έχετε πίστη.

 

INTRODUCTION

I am sending you the text of the complaint to the National Broadcasting Council of the five health workers who are currently on their 24th day of a hunger strike, which they are carrying out in protest against the criminal suspension of their work for refusing mandatory vaccination. This obligation is totally scientifically unjustified and therefore totally illegitimate, too. In addition to the complete economic and social impoverishment of the 7,000 health workers, the country’s public health, which the governors claim to care about, has been put at enormous risk because of the removal of these thousands of health workers from public hospitals (intensive care units are being closed for example e.g. due to a shortage of qualified personnel for these units), and which suspension has the sole purpose of blackmailing them to get vaccinated, just as Greek citizens over 60 years of age are being blackmailed by the imposition of a 100 euros fine every month as long as they are not vaccinated, and at the same time to make an example for the rest of the Greeks to do the same.

I drew up this complaint and sent it to the National Broadcasting Council as their plenipotentiary lawyer. Their choice of me to represent them is not accidental. For over twenty-two months I have been fighting a huge legal battle at the criminal level against the biggest fraud in the history of the Greek nation and the application against Greek citizens of the three protocols of fraud, death and mass vaccination. On July 19th, 2021, I filed a 4,311-page lawsuit with the Sub-Directorate for Combating Organized Crime of the Attica Security Directorate, of the Attica General Police Directorate for the criminal offense of forming and joining a criminal organization, against the Prime Minister of the country, government ministers, scientists, hospital administrators, doctors, the leadership of the criminal justice system, etc. I am sending you the introductory part of the lawsuit translated into English. Since the day of its filing, a great deal of new evidence has emerged about the protocols of fraud and death, which, together with the entire volume of evidence about the mass vaccination protocol, will be submitted in the next few days to the Athens Prosecutor’s Office, where the criminal investigation of the biggest fraud in the history of the Greek nation will begin. In the following days I will also send you a brief description of my legal action with evidence, proof from named testimonies, medical records and autopsies, and audiovisual material, which will shock you.

Lawsuit – Introduction

****************

TO: National Broadcasting Council.

A COMPLAINT OF

1. Lambros Tsapaliaris, a paramedic at the University Hospital of Larissa.
2. Zoe Vaiopoulou, nurse – toolgiver in the operating theatres of Karditsa Hospital.
3. Pericles Karolidis, technologist – radiologist at the Hospital of Veroia.
4. Nikolaos Trivellas, electrician at the Hospital of Chania.
5. Irini Katakou, medical assistant at the Athens Naval Hospital.

 

According to Article 15 § 2 of the Constitution:

“Radio and television are under the direct control of the State. Control and the imposition of administrative sanctions are the exclusive competence of the National Broadcasting Council, which is an independent authority, as provided by law. The direct control of the State, which also takes the form of the prior authorisation regime, is intended to ensure the objective and equal transmission of information and news, as well as the products of speech and art, to ensure the quality of programmes required by the social mission of radio and television and the cultural development of the country, as well as respect for human dignity and the protection of childhood and youth”.

Pursuant to Article 4 § 1 (b) of Law 2863/2000, the N.B.C. (Ε.Σ.Ρ.):

“…controls the compliance with the terms and conditions, as well as the general rules and principles provided for in the applicable broadcasting legislation for the legal, transparent and qualitative operation of public and private operators active in the field of radio and television services”.

Objectivity means, firstly, completeness, i.e. coverage or, at the very least, non-suppression of important events and news; secondly, accuracy, i.e. the attribution of real significance to the information and, above all, the news being broadcast; and thirdly, impartiality in relation to the various groups and factions. The concept of impartiality is close to that of fairness, and the latter has the meaning of a transmission of information and news that is proportional to the parliamentary, general political, economic, etc., and purely newsworthy significance of the overall result. In particular, the constitutional principle of equal treatment prohibits the monopolisation of broadcasting in favour of certain groups, ideas or interests or their disproportionate promotion.

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has reiterated in all its relevant judgements that the press, in the broad sense which includes the informative functions of the audiovisual and online media, has a duty to disseminate information and ideas on all matters of public interest; that this duty is inextricably linked to the public’s right to receive the relevant information and ideas; and that only in this way is the press able to fulfil the vital function of the “public watchdog” for democratic societies, i.e. the control of those in power by reliable journalists who do not consider a well-informed public opinion hostile to them. Indeed, for the ECHR, the rights guaranteed by Article 10 of the ECHR are of particular importance when it comes to information or ideas “which offend, shock or disturb” (see, for example, Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom, 6538/74, 26.4.1979, § 65; Lingens v. Austria, 9815/82, 8.7.1986, § 41; Éditions Plon v. France, 58148/00, 18.5.2004, § 42; Stoll v. Switzerland, 69698/01, 10.12.2007, § 101; Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2), 40660/08 and 60641/08, 7.2.2012, § 101; Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom, 48876/08, 22.4.2013, § 100; Bédat v. Switzerland, 56925/08, 29.3. 2016, § 48- Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland, 931/13, 27.6.2017, § 124- Paraskevopoulos v. Greece, 64184/11, 28.6.2018, § 29- Tagiyev and Huseynov v. Azerbaijan, 13274/08, 5.12.2019, § 36- Monica Macovei v. Romania, 53028/14, 28.7.2020, § 72).

Pursuant to Article 4 § 1 of Law 2328/1995 (in conjunction with Article 4 § 1(e) of Law 2863/2000):

“In case of violation: a) of the provisions of national legislation, European Union legislation and international law directly or indirectly governing private television stations and the operation of private television in general… c) of the rules of ethics, as determined in accordance with Article 3 of this Law, shall be imposed by an act of the Minister of Press and Media and with the consent of the N.B.C. (Ε.Σ.Ρ.), after a hearing of the parties concerned, the following sanctions, depending on the gravity of the infringement, the audience the station attracts, the amount of the investment made or planned and the existence of any recurrences: a) recommendations and warnings, b) a fine of five to five hundred million (5,000,000 to 500,000,000) drachmas (equals to: of 14673 to 1467353 euros) collected in accordance with the provisions of the C.E.D.E (Κ.Ε.Δ.Ε.), as in force from time to time; c) temporary suspension of the station’s operation for up to three months; d) revocation of the station’s operating licence.

The sanction of provisional suspension or revocation may be imposed in parallel with the imposition of a fine. The consent of the National Broadcasting Council for the imposition of the sanctions of temporary suspension or revocation of the licence or a fine exceeding one hundred million (100,000,000) drachmas (equals to: 293470 euros) shall be obtained by a majority of 2/3 of the present members of the National Broadcasting Council.

We are health workers who were suspended from work because we refused to be vaccinated against Covid-19. This measure of suspension, which has no scientific basis (our vaccinated colleagues, like all vaccinated people in general, are equally infected, sick, intubated and dying every day, while at the same time thousands of our colleagues who refused the third dose are working normally), has led us and our families to complete economic and social impoverishment. We have decided to start a hunger strike, and we are already in our 17th day, as a final act of protest against this scientifically totally unjustified and extremely inhumane measure. We have been outside the Ministry of Health since the first day of this strike. Hundreds of citizens visit us every day and show their support.

It is appalling that we have been completely ignored by the major media, which have literally buried this news and information, which is of course of enormous social importance. And it should also be of enormous journalistic interest. It is obvious that the major mainstream media are avoiding to cover this event, because obviously showing it would shake the TV audience, cause huge social concern and create a big problem for the government’s image. The media have no excuse for the absence of any reference to our strike, and it should be noted that other hunger strikes in the past have received wide publicity, a typical example being that of the hunger strike of Dimitris Koufontinas, convicted for his participation in the criminal organization “17 November”.

It is therefore absolutely clear that this behaviour of all the major media violates the national and European legislation in the above-mentioned way, and is also contrary to the relevant decisions of the Council of State and the European Court of Human Rights.

We therefore denounce this violation of the national and European legislation and request that sanctions be imposed by law on those responsible.

We quote the text of our letter of 1.4.2022 with protocol number 159 to the Minister of Health Mr. Athanasios Plevris (which was shown, as well as the whole event in general, by only a few antisystemic websites):

Finally, we indicate that the text of this document will be translated into English and sent to all relevant international institutions.

 

Athens, 7th April 2022

The Plenipotentiary Lawyer

 

Nikos I. Antoniadis

Attorney-at-law in Athens

 

IMPORTANT: Αfter the complaint, we had the collapse of a second health worker who participates in the hunger strike:

 

 

This is the first of us collapsed:

 

 

And these are all of us:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ΠΗΓΗ